|
Listen to article
|
Cameroon’s President Paul Biya announced on Tuesday evening a “slight readjustment” of the timing of legislative and municipal elections that were expected at the start of February.
Originally scheduled for 2025, the elections had already been postponed once until early 2026. No new date was set.
In his televised address on the occasion of the 60th Youth Day, a rare public appearance by the nearly 93-year-old head of state, Biya justified the postponement by citing “certain compelling constraints”, while assuring that “the relevant provisions of the laws, and particularly the Constitution, would be respected”.
Read Also: Senate Reverses Course, Permits E-transmission Of Votes
He also promised to form a new government, having announced its dissolution in his annual speech on New Year’s Eve.
In his speech, he acknowledged the difficulty many young Cameroonians have in finding work, but also called on them to avoid “delinquency, alcohol abuse drug use, and excessive use of social media”.
Cameroon’s Youth Day is traditionally one of the few times the president addresses the nation directly.
Biya, the world’s oldest head of state, has been in power since 1982 and was re-elected in October to an eighth term, leading to protests that were violently suppressed.
There were deadly protests in several parts of Cameroon days after the October 19 vote, followed by a three-day lockdown this week after former minister and key contender Issa Tchiroma claimed victory and alleged vote tampering.
The government has confirmed that at least five people were killed during the protests, although the opposition and civil society groups claim the figures are much higher.
The incumbent, Africa’s second-longest serving leader, took the oath of office during a session of Parliament in what residents describe as the heavily militarised and partially deserted capital, Yaounde.
Priscilla Ayimboh, a 40-year-old seamstress in Yaounde, does not see a new term for Biya as likely to change anything.
“I’m tired of Biya’s rule and I no longer care whatever he does. It’s a pity. I wonder what will become of Cameroon in the next seven years: there are no roads, water, and jobs,” she said.
Munjah Vitalis Fagha, a senior politics lecturer at Cameroon’s University of Buea, told The Associated Press news agency that Biya’s inauguration was “taking place in a tense yet controlled political atmosphere, marked by deep divisions between the ruling elite and a growingly disillusioned populace”.
Cameroon’s top court on October 27 declared Biya the winner of the election, with 53.66 percent of the vote, ahead of his ally-turned-challenger, Tchiroma, who secured 35.19 percent.
Tchiroma insists Biya was awarded a “fraudulent” victory in the election.
“The will of the Cameroonian people was trampled that day, our sovereignty stolen in broad daylight,” Tchiroma wrote on Wednesday night. “This is not democracy, it is electoral theft, a constitutional coup as blatant as it is shameful.”
Biya came to power in 1982 following the resignation of Cameroon’s first president and has ruled since, following a 2008 constitutional amendment that abolished term limits. His health has been a topic of speculation as he spends most of his time in Europe, leaving governance to key party officials and family members.
He has led Cameroon longer than most of its citizens have been alive – more than 70 percent of the country’s almost 30 million population is below the age of 35. If he serves his entire term, Biya will leave office nearly 100 years old.
The results of his nearly half-century in power have been mixed; armed rebellions in the north and the west of the country, along with a stagnant economy, have left many young people disillusioned with the leader.
In other news, Nigeria’s Senate reversed itself Tuesday on a controversial decision that had sparked nationwide protests, voting to permit electronic transmission of election results after initially rejecting the provision last week, though the revised amendment stops short of making the technology mandatory and includes fallback provisions that critics say preserve loopholes for manipulation.
The upper chamber rescinded its February 4 decision during a rowdy emergency session marked by procedural confusion, shouting matches between lawmakers, and brief threats of an individual vote that could have derailed the reversal. Senate Chief Whip Tahir Monguno moved the motion citing “fresh issues” that emerged from closer scrutiny of the bill and overwhelming public backlash against the chamber’s original position, which had retained discretionary “transfer” language instead of requiring real-time electronic “transmission” of polling unit results to the Independent National Electoral Commission’s Result Viewing portal.
“This amendment is to bring our laws to make it a replica of the wishes and aspirations of the people,” Monguno said.
Minority Leader Abba Moro seconded the motion, describing the development as “the beauty of democracy” and noting that lawmakers must retain courage to correct themselves when necessary. Senate President Godswill Akpabio put the motion to a voice vote, which passed with majority support despite audible dissent from some corners of the chamber. The reversal came exactly one week after the Senate had passed the Electoral Act Amendment Bill rejecting mandatory real-time electronic transmission—a decision that triggered protests at the National Assembly gates Monday, condemnation from the Nigeria Labour Congress threatening election boycotts, and accusations from opposition parties and civil society that lawmakers were deliberately creating conditions for electoral fraud ahead of 2027 voting.
Under the revised provision approved Tuesday, presiding officers at polling units shall electronically transmit results to INEC’s portal after completing and signing Form EC8A, the official tally sheet countersigned by party agents. However, the amendment includes a critical caveat: where electronic transmission fails due to network or communication challenges, the manually completed and signed EC8A form will serve as the primary source for result collation and declaration. Critics immediately seized on this language, arguing it provides INEC with the same discretion to avoid electronic transmission that plagued the disputed 2023 presidential election, when the commission failed to upload results as anticipated despite spending billions of naira on the technology and promising voters it would function seamlessly. The provision does not make electronic transmission mandatory in the sense of requiring it under all circumstances or imposing penalties for non-compliance. Instead, it establishes electronic transmission as the default method while explicitly authorizing manual processes when technical problems occur, a framework opposition figures and electoral reform advocates say leaves room for the same failures and manipulation that have undermined confidence in Nigerian elections for decades.
