|
Listen to article
|
Former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai has alleged that his successor, Uba Sani and the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu met and decided his abduction.
El-Rufai made this allegation on Friday when he featured in an interview on ‘Prime Time’, a programme on Arise Television.
Recall that the Department of State Services, DSS, attempted to arrest the ex-governor at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja on Thursday.
“The National Security Advisor, the governor of Kaduna State and the Chairman of ICPC met, and they have decided that I must be abducted today.
“Abducted because people use arrest, they don’t know that arrest has a legal meaning.
“Arrest means a lawful activity with a warrant, the police have. Under the Police act, they can arrest you without a warrant, but every other agency must go to a judge and seek warrant.
“So when you try to take a person without a valid order, it is abduction,” he said.
Read More: Gov Otti: Tinubu’s Tax Policy Opponents Don’t Understand It
Abia State Governor Alex Otti has backed President Bola Tinubu’s tax reform legislation, asserting that critics lack a full grasp of what the measures contain.
Speaking in defense of the overhaul, Otti said elements of the new tax structure mirror positions he advanced nearly a decade ago on Nigeria’s fiscal policy. “Almost 10 years ago, I wrote about the fiscal side of things. When I read the new tax reform law, I saw many of those arguments reflected in it. I thank Prof. Oyedele. When people attack him, they don’t understand,” Otti said.
The remarks position Otti as a prominent supporter of the administration’s push to reconfigure the country’s tax architecture, which has triggered divided responses across Nigeria’s political and economic landscape.
Prof. Taiwo Oyedele chairs the Presidential Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms Committee responsible for designing the changes. His work has drawn both praise from those advocating modernization of Nigeria’s revenue system and criticism from stakeholders concerned about implementation and economic consequences.
Otti suggested the reforms rest on credible fiscal reasoning rather than arbitrary adjustments. By invoking his earlier writings on economic matters, the governor implied the legislation incorporates ideas aimed at enhancing revenue collection and fortifying Nigeria’s financial structure.
The tax reforms represent one of Tinubu’s signature policy initiatives since taking office. The administration has framed the changes as necessary to broaden the tax base, reduce dependence on oil revenues, and create a more efficient system for funding government operations.
However, opposition has emerged from multiple quarters. Some state governors have expressed reservations about how the reforms will affect revenue allocation, particularly for regions that rely heavily on existing distribution formulas. Business groups have raised questions about compliance costs and the potential burden on companies already navigating economic headwinds.
Oyedele, an economist and tax specialist, has defended the committee’s proposals in public forums, arguing they address structural weaknesses that have constrained government finances for years. He has emphasized that the reforms aim to simplify tax administration and eliminate distortions that discourage investment.
Otti’s endorsement carries weight given his background in banking and finance before entering politics. He served as chief executive of Diamond Bank before winning the Abia governorship in 2023, positioning himself as a technocratic leader focused on economic management.
The Abia governor did not specify which aspects of the legislation he found most aligned with his earlier proposals, nor did he detail what concerns he believes critics have misunderstood. His comments suggest disagreement over the reforms stems partly from insufficient engagement with their technical details.
Nigeria’s tax-to-GDP ratio remains among the lowest in Africa, constraining the government’s ability to fund infrastructure, social programs, and public services. Successive administrations have attempted to raise tax collection without significant success, hampered by weak enforcement, widespread evasion, and public resistance to new levies.
The Tinubu administration argues the current system is inequitable, with a narrow segment of the population and corporate sector bearing most of the tax burden while large portions of economic activity escape taxation. Officials contend the reforms will distribute obligations more fairly while increasing total revenue.
Critics counter that timing poses risks, with inflation elevated and economic growth fragile. They warn that aggressive tax measures could depress consumer spending and business investment, potentially worsening conditions rather than generating the anticipated revenue gains.
The National Assembly is reviewing the legislation, with committee hearings drawing testimony from government officials, private sector representatives, and civil society organizations. Lawmakers face pressure to balance fiscal imperatives against political sensitivities, particularly ahead of future electoral contests.
Otti’s public backing may influence other governors, though regional disparities in economic structure mean the reforms will affect states differently. Oil-producing states, manufacturing hubs, and agricultural regions each face distinct implications under the proposed framework.
