Reconciliation talks between Nigeria’s fractured Labour Party factions broke down not over money, but over who would control the party machinery — and Julius Abure wants that distinction on the record.

Abure, who leads one of two competing Labour Party structures locked in a protracted leadership dispute, said closed-door negotiations with Abia State Governor Alex Otti collapsed because the governor refused to loosen his hold on the party’s national apparatus. No financial demands were made, Abure insisted. The disagreement was raw and structural: who runs the party, and on whose terms.

The denial matters because a parallel narrative has been circulating — that Abure’s camp sought money from Otti as a condition for settling the crisis. Abure called that account deliberate misinformation and challenged anyone to identify a moment during the talks when finances were raised.

“At no time was the issue of money discussed,” he said. “Nobody made any financial requests, and nobody offered any money to anyone.”

What was discussed, according to Abure, cuts to the heart of why Nigerian opposition politics so often collapses in on itself. His camp came to the table with concessions — significant ones, by his account. They offered Otti control of the governorship ticket in Abia State, authority to produce all state assembly candidates there, and the right to name candidates for House of Representatives and Senate seats in the state. They extended that offer to any other state where Otti held political interests. They surrendered the offices of National Secretary and other senior national positions.

Otti, Abure said, rejected all of it.

The governor’s position, as Abure described it, was that all seats on the National Working Committee had already been filled — by his camp — and that what remained on offer for Abure’s faction was the Vice Chairmanship and the Secretaryship of the Board of Trustees. Two positions. In exchange for standing down entirely.

Read also: Obi Of Onitsha Graces Abia Fete As Otti Appeals For Cohesion

Abure characterized that as no offer at all.

The Labour Party’s internal war has been festering for months, pitting Abure’s faction against a rival structure aligned with Otti and recognized by a separate court ruling. Both sides claim legitimacy. Both are maneuvering with one eye on the 2027 general elections, where the party’s ability to field credible candidates in multiple states depends on resolving — or at least managing — the split.

As recently as last month, Otti had signaled openness to reconciliation. Speaking at the inaugural meeting of the party’s National Working Committee in Abuja, where he attended as an observer, the governor said the party’s doors remained open to Abure’s loyalists. That statement generated cautious optimism inside the party. The meeting that followed extinguished it.

Read more: Otti Rolls Out Aba Fashion Initiative For Economic Growth

Abure placed the blame entirely on what he called Otti’s recalcitrance — an unwillingness to give ground even when his opponents were offering to shrink their demands. He described the governor as holding a prior position and refusing to move from it regardless of what was placed on the table.

The factional chairman framed his camp not as rebels but as the legitimate custodians of a party being held hostage. He accused unnamed forces of seeking to destabilize Labour from within, describing them as “political buccaneers and merchants” — language that signals this dispute has moved well past procedural disagreement into something more personal and more corrosive.

His final recourse, Abure made clear, is the Supreme Court. An appeal is already filed. He expressed confidence the apex court would resolve the leadership question in his faction’s favor, effectively arguing that what negotiations could not produce, a judgment will.

That confidence may be warranted or it may be posturing — Nigerian court timelines make predictions hazardous. What is not in dispute is that the Labour Party enters the 2027 election cycle divided, with its two most prominent figures unable to agree on the basic terms of sitting in the same room.

For a party that rode Peter Obi’s 2023 presidential campaign to its strongest national performance in years, the deterioration is stark. The coalition that turned out millions of first-time voters and urban youth behind a promise of something different has watched its party spend the intervening years fighting over who gets to chair committees and distribute tickets.

Abure’s side says it will keep pushing to recover what it considers its rightful place. Otti’s side controls the structure on the ground. The Supreme Court has the last word — whenever it chooses to speak.