|
Listen to article
|
Donald Trump’s patience with European allies who refused to back his Iran war has a price tag, and Germany just received the first invoice. The Pentagon confirmed Friday that approximately 5,000 American troops would be pulled from Germany over the next six to twelve months — a decision that landed inside NATO like a stone thrown through a window, prompting the alliance to announce it was working urgently to understand what Washington had done and why.
The withdrawal did not arrive without warning. Trump had spent weeks telegraphing his frustration with European governments that declined to join the military campaign against Iran, withheld their bases from offensive operations, and dragged their feet on contributing forces to any effort to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz accelerated the rupture when he said Monday that Iran was “humiliating” Washington at the negotiating table — a remark that Trump apparently decided deserved a response beyond words. The troop withdrawal followed within days, accompanied by an announcement that EU tariffs on cars and trucks would jump from 15 to 25 percent next week.
Germany is where the numbers hurt most. Of the roughly 100,000 American troops stationed across Europe, 36,436 are in Germany — more than Italy and Spain combined. Removing 5,000 does not hollow out that presence, but it establishes a precedent and a direction. Trump said Thursday that Italy and Spain could be next. “Italy has not been of any help to us and Spain has been horrible, absolutely horrible,” he told reporters, and when asked if he would follow through on withdrawals there, he replied: “Yeah, probably, I probably will. Why shouldn’t I?”
Read also: ‘Putin Let Me Down’ – Donald Trump Alleges
Two of the most senior Republican voices on military affairs pushed back with unusual directness. Senator Roger Wicker and Representative Mike Rogers, who chair the Armed Services Committees in their respective chambers, issued a joint statement Saturday warning that the withdrawal risks “sending the wrong signal to Vladimir Putin.” They noted that Germany had increased its defense spending in response to Trump’s demands and had opened its bases and airspace to American planes operating in the Iran conflict.
Pulling troops now, they implied, punishes compliance rather than defiance — a message that undermines the administration’s own leverage with every other ally it is trying to move.
NATO spokeswoman Allison Hart chose her words carefully in the alliance’s public response, acknowledging the decision while folding it into the burden-sharing argument the alliance has been making for years. The adjustment, she wrote, “underscores the need for Europe to continue to invest more in defense and take on a greater share of the responsibility for our shared security.” The framing converted a punitive withdrawal into a policy argument — whether that framing holds depends on whether European governments read it the same way Washington intended.
Read more: US: Donald Trump Identifies Eight Non-Tariff Cheating
Berlin took the news with the composure of a government that had been watching this coming for months. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the withdrawal “was to be expected.” Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul described ongoing discussions with Washington as close and conducted “in a spirit of trust,” while making one thing unambiguous: the major American installations in Germany, Ramstein Air Base above all, were not negotiable. Ramstein has “an irreplaceable function for the United States and for us alike,” Wadephul said — a reminder that the leverage in this relationship runs both directions, and that American military power in Europe depends on European geography in ways that withdrawal threats do not erase.
The question hanging over all of it is what the withdrawals are actually designed to achieve. If the goal is to force European allies into the Hormuz coalition Trump has been demanding, the mechanism is punishing governments for positions their publics overwhelmingly support — which is rarely a reliable path to the outcome you want. If the goal is simply to signal that American patience has limits and that the post-World War II security guarantee is no longer unconditional, the signal has been sent.
Whether the allies receiving it respond by capitulating or by accelerating their own defense independence is the variable that will define European security for the next generation.
Trump has been threatening to do this since his first term. He is doing it now. The troops are moving. The question of what comes next belongs to everyone.
