|
Listen to article
|
Former Venezuela President, Nicolas Maduro appeared in a federal courtroom in Manhattan on Thursday for the second time since his capture by United States forces in early January, pressing for the dismissal of narco-terrorism charges against him in a case that has generated acute legal and geopolitical complexity and drawn close scrutiny from governments across Latin America and beyond.
The ousted Venezuelan president and his wife, Cilia Flores, 69, appeared before Judge Alvin Hellerstein at the Southern District of New York in a procedural hearing focused primarily on whether the case can proceed at all, given a dispute over who may legally pay for Maduro’s defense counsel.
At issue is a decision by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to reverse an earlier administrative approval that would have allowed the Venezuelan government to fund Maduro’s legal representation. His attorney, Barry Pollack, has said he will be forced to withdraw from the case if OFAC does not authorize Venezuela to cover the fees. He has argued that blocking state payment constitutes a violation of Maduro’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel of his choosing, and on those grounds filed a motion to have the indictment thrown out entirely. “The only solution is to drop the charges, because this court cannot allow this case to proceed in violation of constitutional rights,” Pollack wrote in a court submission.
Prosecutors countered that the initial OFAC authorization was an administrative error and maintained that OFAC regulations expressly prohibit the use of funds controlled by a sanctioned government to cover the legal fees of a separately sanctioned individual. They noted that Maduro retains access to his personal funds in Venezuela and, should those be insufficient, would be entitled to court-appointed representation under U.S. law.
Legal analysts said dismissal on those grounds appeared unlikely given the presiding judge’s experience with high-profile national security proceedings, but that Hellerstein’s response to the constitutional arguments would be closely watched nonetheless. William Dodge, an international law professor at George Washington University, told CNN the defense faced substantial obstacles on multiple fronts.
“Under the U.S. Constitution, it’s the president who gets to determine who to recognize as head of state, and I am 100 percent certain a U.S. court is not going to second-guess a U.S. determination that Maduro is no longer head of state,” he said. He added that while the capture itself violated international law, long-established U.S. precedent holds that the illegality of bringing a defendant into court does not affect that court’s jurisdiction.
Read Also: Venezuela Frees 379 Political Prisoners In Amnesty Move
Maduro faces four counts in total: conspiracy to commit narco-terrorism, conspiracy to import cocaine, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and a further conspiracy charge relating to possession of those same weapons. Flores faces parallel charges, including two counts of cocaine importation conspiracy and related weapons offenses. The indictment alleges that Maduro and senior co-conspirators used the apparatus of the Venezuelan state over more than two decades to facilitate the movement of cocaine through the country and into the United States, providing protection and logistical support to Colombian narco-terrorist organizations including the FARC and the ELN.
The couple was captured in the early hours of January 3, when U.S. military and law enforcement personnel descended on their compound in Caracas in an operation backed by warplanes and a naval deployment. Venezuelan officials reported that at least 83 people were killed and more than 112 wounded during the assault. No U.S. service members died. Maduro entered his initial plea at the same Manhattan courthouse on January 5, identifying himself as president of Venezuela and describing his removal as a kidnapping. “I am a prisoner of war,” he told the court in Spanish.
Since then, Maduro has been held at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, a federal facility with a documented record of poor conditions. He is confined alone in a cell, without internet access or newspapers, and is permitted to speak by telephone with family members and lawyers for a maximum of 15 minutes per call. His son, National Assembly member Nicolas Maduro Guerra, known informally as Nicolasito, said his father was exercising daily, remained in good spirits, and had told the family: “We are fine, we are fighters.”
Pollack has signaled additional lines of challenge to come. He is expected to argue that Maduro retains head-of-state immunity for conduct that took place while he held the presidency, and separately to contest the legality of the manner in which his client was removed from Venezuelan territory. Whether either argument succeeds is, in the assessment of most legal scholars, unlikely, though the unprecedented nature of the proceedings means some questions remain without clear judicial precedent.
Read Also: US Senate Rebukes President Trump Over Venezuela
In Caracas, the government led by interim president Delcy Rodriguez has pursued a markedly different path from her predecessor’s defiance. She has enacted a sweeping amnesty law releasing political prisoners jailed under Maduro’s administration, restructured oil and mining regulations in alignment with U.S. commercial interests, and received formal U.S. diplomatic recognition this month. Rodriguez has not publicly commented on the substance of the New York proceedings, though Venezuelan officials have continued to demand Maduro’s release through international forums.
Judge Hellerstein had originally scheduled Thursday’s hearing to allow both legal teams to review evidence and sketch out a schedule for further motions, with a view to eventually setting a trial date. That process is likely to take considerably longer given the legal entanglements now before the court. No trial date has been set. The next scheduled court proceeding will be determined by Hellerstein based on Thursday’s arguments.
