|
Listen to article
|
What roads hide when scrutiny disappears.
Infrastructure Without Transparency: Following the Money
Nyesom Wike didn’t just build. He consolidated—using flyovers and road contracts as the delivery system for a patronage network that thrived precisely where the public record went dark. The method was elegant and brutal: pick photogenic projects, accelerate awards, centralize decisions, then starve the ledger that would let citizens check price, competition, and payments. That is how infrastructure becomes the laundering medium of political power—and potentially of money.
The proof we can publish today is not guesswork; it’s the absence of the disclosures that clean projects always produce. Global standards require end-to-end transparency—from business case to change orders. Rivers State under Wike consistently chose the inverse: show the bridge, hide the book.
Exhibit A: Standards that would have exposed a kickback economy—ignored or sidelined
- The OECD Recommendation on the Governance of Infrastructure is specific: publish a credible pipeline, disclose whole-of-life costs, ensure competitive tendering, and subject projects to independent assurance (OECD, 2020). Its 2023 indicators and 2024 toolkit translate that into checklists—conflict-of-interest registers, bidder data, evaluation notes, contract and payment disclosure (OECD, 2023, 2024).
- Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS)and OC4IDS define the exact fields that unmask favoritism and inflated pricing: tender notices, bidder counts, award criteria, BoQs, variation orders, milestones, and disbursements (Open Contracting Partnership [OCP], n.d.-a; n.d.-b; 2020).
- CoST(the Infrastructure Transparency Initiative) exists for one reason: construction is where overpricing and capture are easiest. CoST’s assurance model forces sunlight on scope, cost, and delivery risks (CoST, 2020, 2024).
- Nigeria’s own BPPrules require NOCOPO submissions, competitive processes by default, and documentation even under “urgent” procedures; in 2025 the BPP tightened thresholds and refreshed manuals—no governor could claim there were no rules (Bureau of Public Procurement [BPP], 2020a, 2020b, 2020c, 2025a, 2025b).
Under these standards, a clean administration leaves a data shadow: every kilometer priced, every change order explained, every payment logged. Where that shadow is missing, rent extraction risk explodes.
Exhibit B: Four red-flag patterns consistent with self-dealing and graft
1) Pipeline opacity—policy by spectacle.
OECD’s first guardrail is front-end disclosure: the list of priority projects, the problem each solves, alternatives assessed, and value-for-money logic (OECD, 2020, 2024). Rivers under Wike prioritized performative unveilings over pipeline transparency. Without ex-ante business cases, there’s no way to test gold-plating, political timing, or whether less flashy options (rehabs, bottleneck fixes) would save more lives and money.
2) Contractor concentration—closed shop economics.
OCDS/OC4IDS let citizens compute market concentration (HHI) across awards. A tight cluster of repeat winners, short tender windows, serial “direct procurement,” or recycled justification memos are textbook flags for bid-rigging and kickback pipelines (OCP, n.d.-a; n.d.-b; 2020). Rivers’ publicity machine celebrated ground-breakings; it did not publish full machine-readable award histories and bidder statistics. That is not an oversight; it is a design.
3) Change-order secrecy—where the cream lives.
In construction, overpricing doesn’t always happen on day one. It blooms in variations and scope drift. OC4IDS requires disclosing variation orders, schedule slippage, and payment trails (OCP, 2020). When those fields are dark, cartel math flourishes: underbid to win, then harvest via “unforeseen” changes. Rivers kept the cameras on steel and kept the ledgers off the record.
4) No independent assurance—marking your own homework.
CoST exists to prevent exactly this: the executive controlling the narrative also controlling the numbers (CoST, 2020, 2024). If Rivers wanted the public to know the truth, it would have enrolled major works into CoST assurance and published the findings. It did not. When scrutiny disappears, margin theft becomes a rounding error.
Exhibit C: “Emergency” and speed—the alibi that prints money
BPP’s emergency guidance was written to preserve competition, audit trails, and after-the-fact disclosure even when timing is tight (BPP, 2020a). Instead, the Wike era treated speed as immunity from daylight. The World Bank’s Nigeria procurement plans (SPESSE, Fiscal Governance) prove you can move fast and document properly (World Bank, 2019a, 2019b). If Rivers didn’t log tenders, evaluations, and payments to NOCOPO—and didn’t mirror them in open OCDS—speed wasn’t the goal. Secrecy was.
Read also: Wike And The Making Of A Captured State—Part 2
Exhibit D: PPPs as stealth debt and patronage carriers
When a governor says “innovative financing,” ask for the public sector comparator and the contingent liability note. The ICRC provides model docs and rules precisely to stop leaders from shunting off-balance-sheet risks onto the future (Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission [ICRC], n.d.-a, n.d.-b; 2019). Without transparent value-for-money analyses and risk allocation tables, PPPs become a dual-use device: rent funnel today, fiscal trap tomorrow (OECD, 2020, 2024). In a state that already “borrowed like a poor one” (see Part 4), Wike’s rush into opaque financing vehicles wasn’t policy sophistication; it was hazard masking.
How the alleged graft would work (the mechanics)
- Pre-tender rigging:Under-the-table briefings and spec design pointing to a pre-selected firm; short windows that eliminate rivals.
- Award choreography:Minimal bidder disclosure; criteria written to fit one “competent” insider.
- Variation harvest:After award, rapid “discoveries” inflate quantities; contractor bills climb; oversight is told it’s “technical”.
- Payment fog:Milestones declared; disbursements opaque; retention money released without independent assurance.
- Narrative substitution:New flyover announced; the last contract’s ledger stays buried.
Each step is detectable—but only if the data are published in the formats the world now recognizes (OCP, n.d.-a; 2020; OECD, 2023; CoST, 2020).
Rivers vs. best practice: the price we can’t see
The World Bank and OECD have both quantified the governance premium in infrastructure: weak planning and opaque procurement raise prices long before work begins (World Bank, 2023, 2025; OECD, 2020, 2024). The AfDB’s Nigeria diagnostic adds the country-specific warning: subnational leakages and soft budget discipline convert capital budgets into patronage pools unless procurement is defensible end-to-end (African Development Bank Group, 2023). That’s the forensic lens for Wike’s program: not whether roads were built, but whether Rivers paid more than it should to firms it shouldn’t, in processes that couldn’t be audited.
The numbers that would clear Wike—or condemn his method
If Wike’s defenders want absolution, they can produce five datasets tomorrow for every flagship project:
- Business cases(alternatives, socio-economic returns) (OECD, 2020, 2024).
- Full OCDS/OC4IDS records(tenders → awards → contracts → changes → payments) (OCP, n.d.-a; 2020; n.d.-b).
- Competition logs(bidder lists, evaluation notes, reasons for selection) (BPP, 2020c; 2025b).
- Assurance reports(CoST) proving scope and price integrity (CoST, 2020, 2024).
- PPP comparators(ICRC) showing taxpayers weren’t trapped in off-book liabilities (ICRC, n.d.-a, n.d.-b; 2019).
If these don’t exist, or exist only in fragments, then the pattern is not administrative sloppiness. It is deliberate opacity—the primary instrument of corruption in construction.
Why this matters beyond Rivers
This isn’t just about one man’s roads. It’s a template for state capture by contract. Infrastructure spending is the biggest pot in any budget; whoever controls it controls politics. That is why every serious reform movement in the world starts with open contracting and independent assurance. Nigerians don’t need another speech about “legacy projects.” They need the ledger.
The corrective—what a post-Wike cleanup must do now
- Retroactive sunlight.Publish Wike-era OCDS/OC4IDS project packs, including BoQs, change orders, and all payments (OCP, 2020; n.d.-a; n.d.-b).
- Assurance before final pay.Enroll major works in CoST; withhold retention money until independent reports certify scope/price (CoST, 2020, 2024).
- Hardwire NOCOPO.Align Rivers’ manuals and thresholds to the BPP 2025 refresh; make non-submission a sanctionable offence (BPP, 2025a, 2025b; 2020c).
- De-politicize planning.Adopt OECD pipeline protocols; publish business cases and whole-life costs before tender (OECD, 2020, 2024).
- Vet PPPs like debt.No deal without ICRC-compliant VfM and liability disclosures; publish the public sector comparator (ICRC, n.d.-a, n.d.-b; 2019).
- Benchmark and score.Use Benchmarking Infrastructure Development and InfraGov 2.0 to track governance gains—and the falling cost of opacity (World Bank, 2023, 2025).
- Build capacity against capture.Tap SPESSE and Fiscal Governance projects to train planners and procurers who can say no (World Bank, 2019a, 2019b; AfDB, 2023).
The verdict
Wike’s infrastructure blitz was not a technocrat’s miracle. It was a political financial technology—turning public awe into private leverage by ensuring the one thing that makes graft impossible to hide—the data—stayed hidden. The bridges may stand; the books do not. Until Rivers publishes those books in the formats the world accepts, the presumption must shift: where the ledger is missing, the margin belongs to someone who doesn’t want you to see it.
Professor MarkAnthony Ujunwa Nze is an internationally acclaimed investigative journalist, public intellectual, and global governance analyst whose work shapes contemporary thinking at the intersection of health and social care management, media, law, and policy. Renowned for his incisive commentary and structural insight, he brings rigorous scholarship to questions of justice, power, and institutional integrity.
Based in New York, he serves as a full tenured professor and Academic Director at the New York Center for Advanced Research (NYCAR), where he leads high-impact research in governance innovation, strategic leadership, and geopolitical risk. He also oversees NYCAR’s free Health & Social Care professional certification programs, accessible worldwide at:
https://www.newyorkresearch.org/professional-certification/
Professor Nze remains a defining voice in advancing ethical leadership and democratic accountability across global systems.
Selected Sources (APA 7th Edition)
African Development Bank Group. (2023). Nigeria country diagnostic note 2023. https://www.afdb.org/sites/default/files/documents/projects-and-operations/nigeria_country_diagnostic_note_2023.pdf
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2020a, May). Guideline on COVID-19 procurements. https://www.bpp.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BPP-Guideline-on-COVID-19-Procurements-1.pdf
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2020b). Annual report 2020: Ensuring transparency, competition and value for money. https://www.bpp.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Annual-Report-2020.pdf
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2020c, June). Circular: Nigeria Open Contracting Portal (NOCOPO) submissions. https://www.bpp.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/NOCOPO-CIRCULAR-2020.pdf
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2025a, May 16). Procurement thresholds announcement. https://www.bpp.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Threshold-Announcement.pdf
Bureau of Public Procurement. (2025b, February). Revised procurement procedure manual. https://www.bpp.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/21.-REVISED-BPP-PROCUREMENT-PROCEDURE-MANUAL.doc
CoST—The Infrastructure Transparency Initiative. (2020, November). Why do we need CoST? https://infrastructuretransparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/The-Need-for-CoST.pdf
CoST—The Infrastructure Transparency Initiative. (2024, October). Annual report & signed accounts 2023. https://infrastructuretransparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/The-Construction-Sector-Transparency-Intiative-Full-signed-accounts.pdf
Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission. (2019, April 10). PPP—An imperative for Nigeria’s inclusive national development (policy brief). https://www.icrc.gov.ng/assets/uploads/2020/03/PPP-an-imperative-for-Nigerias-inclusive-national-development.-10th-April-2019.pdf
Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission. (n.d.-a). PPP overview (regulatory mandate). https://www.icrc.gov.ng/ppp/
Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission. (n.d.-b). PPP resources: Regulations, manuals, and standard bidding documents. https://www.icrc.gov.ng/resources/icrc-publications/
OECD. (2020, July 17). Recommendation of the Council on the Governance of Infrastructure (OECD/LEGAL/0460). https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0460
OECD. (2023). OECD infrastructure governance indicators. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/06/oecd-infrastructure-governance-indicators_3c046ecb/95c2cef2-en.pdf
OECD. (2024). Infrastructure governance (toolkit portal). https://infrastructure-toolkit.oecd.org/governance/
Open Contracting Partnership. (2020, October 12). Creating a data standard for infrastructure transparency: Building it (OC4IDS). https://www.open-contracting.org/2020/10/12/creating-a-data-standard-for-infrastructure-transparency-building-it/
Open Contracting Partnership. (n.d.-a). Open Contracting Data Standard (OCDS). https://www.open-contracting.org/data-standard/
Open Contracting Partnership. (n.d.-b). OC4IDS: Open Contracting for Infrastructure Data Standard. https://www.open-contracting.org/about/infrastructure/
World Bank. (2019a, December 2). Nigeria—Sustainable Procurement, Environmental and Social Standards Enhancement (SPESSE) Project: Procurement plan (STEP27332). https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/573791575289588015
World Bank. (2019b). Nigeria—Fiscal Governance and Institutions Project: Procurement plan (P163540). https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/262881569000020574
World Bank. (2023). Benchmarking infrastructure development 2023—Economies portal. https://bpp.worldbank.org/en/economies
World Bank. (2025, January 15). InfraGov 2.0: Overview of the new infrastructure governance assessment framework. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099013125121510134/pdf/P1710691afa831041888b10e3900a455e6.pdf
