HomeOpinionFalsehood No. 84 — The “Open For Business” Deception

Falsehood No. 84 — The “Open For Business” Deception

Listen to article

Fact-Check 84 | When Slogans Replace Measurable Reality

By Prof. MarkAnthony Nze

The Phrase That Travels Faster Than Proof

In multiple public appearances, economic summits, investment forums, and budget addresses, Governor Hope Uzodinma has repeatedly declared that “Imo is open for business.” The phrase has become a governing refrain—short, confident, and deliberately elastic. It does not claim a ranking. It does not cite a benchmark. It offers reassurance without disclosure.

That elasticity is precisely why it demands scrutiny.

In public policy and political economy, slogans are not evaluated by frequency of use but by verifiable outcomes observable in independent datasets. “Open for business” is not an attitude or aspiration; it is a measurable condition. And conditions, unlike slogans, leave empirical traces.

What “Open for Business” Means in Measurable Terms

Across international and subnational development frameworks, a business-enabling environment is defined by a convergence of indicators: regulatory predictability, cost of compliance, speed of registration, security of assets, tax clarity, dispute resolution efficiency, and—critically—business survival rates (World Bank, 2020; PEBEC, 2023).

If Imo were substantively “open for business,” several measurable relationships would hold simultaneously:

Business registrations would show sustained positive net growth, not high churn.
Regulatory timelines would converge toward national best performers.
Informal costs would decline relative to peer states.
Business survival rates would exceed closure rates by a clear margin.
Independent rankings would show upward mobility over time.

The data does not support these outcomes.

Ease of Doing Business: Where Imo Actually Ranks

Nigeria’s most authoritative subnational business environment assessment is produced by the Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council (PEBEC). Its scorecards evaluate states across multiple indicators including land administration, tax processes, construction permits, regulatory efficiency, and dispute resolution.

Across the most recent assessments, Imo does not appear among top-tier performers and does not lead the South-East (PEBEC, 2023; PEBEC, 2025). Lagos, Kaduna, Oyo, and the Federal Capital Territory consistently outperform on composite indices. Even within the region, Imo trails peers on procedural speed and predictability.

This matters because rankings are comparative by design. Claims of improvement acquire meaning only when measured against peers. On that scale, Imo’s performance is mid-to-low table, not exemplary.

The SABER Grant: Reward ≠ Ranking

The Imo State Government has frequently referenced the World Bank’s SABER performance-based grant, valued at approximately ₦6.8 billion, as evidence of business-friendly reform (World Bank, 2024; Vanguard, 2024). The grant is real. The inference drawn from it is overstated.

SABER rewards completion of specific reform actions—such as digitisation steps or procedural adjustments—not holistic business performance. It does not rank states. It does not measure investor outcomes. It does not certify an economy as “open for business.”

Confusing process incentives with economic conditions is analytically indefensible.

Formally:
Process Compliance (PC) ≠ Economic Openness (EO).
At best, PC → potential EO, conditional on execution integrity. That conditional has not been satisfied.

Business Formation Versus Business Survival

Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) data shows that Imo records new business registrations annually (CAC, 2024). This is often presented as evidence of openness. But registrations are a gross metric.

What matters is net survival.

Data from the NBS Business Demography Statistics (2024) shows that states with genuinely enabling environments exhibit a positive survival curve, where registrations consistently outpace closures.

Let:
R = registrations
C = closures

In a business-friendly system:
R − C > 0 by a meaningful, stable margin.

In Imo, the margin is weak and volatile. High SME closure rates—driven by regulatory friction, informal levies, and uncertainty—erode registration gains. High churn is not openness; it is fragility.

Revenue Reality as a Business Signal

Internally Generated Revenue (IGR) is a downstream but reliable indicator of business vitality. In 2024, Nigerian states generated approximately ₦3.63 trillion in IGR (NBS, 2025). Imo contributed roughly ₦25.27 billion, or 0.69 percent of the total (Nairametrics, 2025).

Mathematically:
Imo IGR Share = 25.27 ÷ 3,630 ≈ 0.0069

States that are substantively open for business typically exhibit IGR elasticity, where modest policy improvements produce outsized revenue gains. Imo’s IGR growth remains modest relative to national acceleration, suggesting structural rather than cyclical constraints.

This is not conjecture. It is arithmetic.

 The Informal Cost Problem

BudgIT (2024) and the Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ, 2023) document persistent informal regulatory costs in Imo—multiple levies, overlapping enforcement, discretionary fees, and inconsistent interpretations of authority.

For businesses, total operating cost is not statutory tax alone:

Total Cost = Formal Tax (T) + Informal Costs (I) + Risk Premium (ρ)

Where I and ρ are elevated, investment retreats regardless of slogans. In Imo, both variables remain high relative to neighbouring states, undermining the “open for business” narrative.

No economy is open where uncertainty is monetized.

Read also: Falsehood No. 83 — “Imo Operates World-Class Fiscal Transparency”

Labor and Market Signals Tell the Same Story

According to the NBS Labour Force Survey (2023), youth unemployment and underemployment in Imo remain above the national comfort threshold. Employment is a lagging indicator, but it is also unforgivingly honest.

If business openness were expanding, employment growth would at least track population growth. It does not.

The relationship is straightforward:
Employment Growth = α + β(Business Openness) + ε

In Imo, β fails to materialise.

What Investors Actually Do

Capital does not listen to speeches; it responds to risk-adjusted returns. Independent investment trackers show ongoing capital migration within the South-East, with Anambra and Abia attracting relatively stronger SME and light-manufacturing interest (African Development Bank, 2024).

Investors compare states side-by-side. Imo is not winning that comparison.

Capital’s behaviour is a verdict.

Language Inflation and Policy Substitution

The phrase “open for business” has become a substitute for evidence. It compresses complex conditions into a marketable line. But when language expands faster than institutional reform, credibility erodes.

In ratio terms:
Narrative Growth (N) ÷ Structural Reform (S) > 1

This imbalance explains why slogans persist while outcomes lag.

Verdict — Open in Speech, Constrained in Fact

Governor Uzodinma’s declaration that Imo is “open for business” is not false because reform efforts do not exist. It is false because the phrase implies conditions that the data does not support.

Independent rankings do not place Imo among top performers.
Business survival rates remain fragile.
Informal costs persist.
Revenue signals are weak.
Investor behaviour contradicts the narrative.

In economic governance, openness is not declared.
It is revealed—through ratios, rankings, and results.

Until Imo’s business environment shows measurable convergence with leading states, “open for business” will remain what it currently is: a slogan in search of supporting evidence.

Professor MarkAnthony Ujunwa Nze is an internationally acclaimed investigative journalist, public intellectual, and global governance analyst whose work shapes contemporary thinking at the intersection of health and social care management, media, law, and policy. Renowned for his incisive commentary and structural insight, he brings rigorous scholarship to questions of justice, power, and institutional integrity.

Based in New York, he serves as a full tenured professor and Academic Director at the New York Center for Advanced Research (NYCAR), where he leads high-impact research in governance innovation, strategic leadership, and geopolitical risk. He also oversees NYCAR’s free Health & Social Care professional certification programs, accessible worldwide at:
 https://www.newyorkresearch.org/professional-certification/

Professor Nze remains a defining voice in advancing ethical leadership and democratic accountability across global systems.

Selected Sources

African Development Bank. (2024). Nigeria business climate and competitiveness review.

BudgIT Foundation. (2024). State of states report 2024.

Corporate Affairs Commission. (2024). State-level business registration data.

Foundation for Investigative Journalism. (2023). States failing revenue and business environment targets.

International Monetary Fund. (2023). Fiscal transparency handbook.

National Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Labour force survey.

National Bureau of Statistics. (2025). Internally generated revenue at state level, 2024.

Nairametrics. (2025). States with the lowest internally generated revenue in 2024.

Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council. (2023). Subnational ease of doing business report.

Presidential Enabling Business Environment Council. (2025). Ease of doing business reform scorecard.

Vanguard Newspapers. (2024). Imo gets ₦6.8bn World Bank SABER reward.

World Bank Group. (2020). Doing business in Nigeria 2020.

World Bank Group. (2024). SABER Nigeria implementation review.

The Eastern Updates

Most Popular

Recent Comments