HomeEditorialSack Of 1000 Aides, Is Gov Umahi Right Or Wrong?

Sack Of 1000 Aides, Is Gov Umahi Right Or Wrong?

Ebonyi State Governor David Umahi early last week wielded the big stick, sacking more than 1,000 aides of their duties, effective from  August 1.

Categories of persons affected by the purge include Technical Assistants (TAs), Senior Technical Assistants (STAs) and Executive Assistants (EAs).

The governor, who was reported saying governance in the state was no longer “business as usual,” ascribed his heavy hand to non-performance by those sacked. Speaking in Abakaliki, the state capital, during virtual swearing-in of some Special Assistants and Caretaker Chairmen of Local Governments, among others, he said:

“We have over 1,000 of you, over 350 LGA liaison officers and several development centres management committee members, yet myself and my deputy threw ourselves ‘in the ring’ on the COVID-19 issue. I don’t know where else you get a position, where you just sleep and wait for bank alert.”

Read Also: Ebonyi Governor, Umahi To Sack 1,000 Aides In August

But Umahi left the window open for possible return of the sacked officials to service. He said those who wished to reapply for the positions must be endorsed by a state government ministry or department. “We will hold such a ministry or department responsible for you and you must have and show us your farm if you wish to re-apply. People who were never in these categories of aides should not apply because I will not expand such offices. But if we don’t fill all the positions, we will then call for nominations,” he added.

It is apparent from what the governor said that people were being displaced, not that the jobs were being shuttered. The jobs remain available for repossession by ‘qualified’ re-applicants, or fresh applicants in the event that not all those sacked get reabsorbed. Actually, Umahi spoke at an event where a fresh aides were being sworn into office. nThe challenge he had obviously was not with the bloated number of aides but with expected deliverables.

Most of those affected could not have been tied to agriculture, so their positions may be gone forever. With throngs of special assistants, technical assistants, senior technical assistants, and executive assistants, among others, duty postings are endlessly convoluted.

It is legitimate to wonder what could be the job descriptions of these aides, without duty postings being duplicated or outright conflicting. This may partly explain the laidback attitude of the aides who came under the governor’s hammer.

The Ebonyi scenario underscores the high level of unemployment in the Nigerian economy, which political office holders seek to assuage with patronage of supporters through provision of sinecure jobs. This is one major cause of the huge cost of governance that has overburdened the country and hamstrung economic growth over the years; it is also a reflection of the perception of government as mainly an avenue for political reward.

Bogus political appointments by public office holders also signpost imperial leadership in the guise of democratic governance.

The officeholder sets up a structure of extra-statutory control by enlisting throngs of personal aides as props for his own political platform rather than for required service to society – unfortunately so, at the cost of overburdening the public purse. This goes to the heart of the enduring question about political accountability by public officers.

The Ebonyi experience is common to all states and levels of government in Nigeria, but will sacking en masse be the right step to take in cleansing unnecessary beneficiaries of Government allocation?

 

THE EASTERN UPDATES

Most Popular

Recent Comments