|
Listen to article
|
On Friday, March 21, 2025, Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), returned to the Federal High Court in Abuja for a hearing in his ongoing treason case, now under the oversight of a new judge, Justice James Omotosho. The proceedings marked a shift in the legal dispute with Kanu Agabi (SAN) stepping in as the new head of the defense team, replacing previous counsel, while the prosecution continued under the leadership of Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN).
Moments after the court noted appearances, Kanu’s counsel, Chief Agabi, sought permission to address the bench. He opened with a series of apologies on behalf of his client, acknowledging a need to mend past grievances. He expressed regret to Justice Binta Nyako, the previous judge who had recused herself from the case, admitting that Kanu’s criticisms of her were unwarranted. Agabi explained that Kanu’s frustration had simmered for years, fueling his sharp words, but stressed that this did not justify the verbal assaults directed at Nyako.
The apologies extended further—to the prosecution team led by Awomolo, as well as to the chairman of the Body of Benchers, figures Agabi noted were held in high esteem. He also conveyed Kanu’s remorse toward his own legal team, whom he had similarly lashed out at during the contentious proceedings. This opening gesture set a reflective tone for the hearing, signaling an intent to reset the dynamics as the case unfolds before Justice Omotosho.
Read also: Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial To Start Afresh March 21 With New Judge
Agabi added that Kanu was a good man and everyone can’t be of like minds. Agabi pleaded that room should be made for errors, and they must strive to save and not destroy.
The prosecution, led by Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), acknowledged the apology from Nnamdi Kanu’s defense team and pledged to work diligently toward a swift resolution of the treason case. Awomolo expressed an understanding of Kanu’s emotions and recognized the intense public scrutiny surrounding the matter, affirming the prosecution’s commitment to an expeditious trial.
Justice James Omotosho, presiding over the hearing, observed that the prolonged duration of the legal process might have weighed heavily on Kanu. He noted that when Kanu was first arraigned in 2015 at the age of 47, the uncertainty of his fate was already evident; now, at 57, that uncertainty persists. The judge suggested that this extended ordeal could have contributed to Kanu’s outspoken remarks, some of which he deemed inappropriate. On behalf of Kanu, Justice Omotosho extended an apology to the prosecution, reinforcing a tone of reconciliation as the court moved forward.
